We build narrow AI tools for property management operations teams in the US and Canada: a maintenance call line, after hours leasing enquiries, inspection reports from notes, tenant file checks before an audit, and lease answers that cite the clause. A person checks every output.
What we build
Each tool does one job, on purpose. It works alongside your property management software, does the repeatable part, and hands the decision to a person.
The engineering behind these jobs: voice AI agents, RAG systems and AI agent development.
What we stand behind
The number comes from real inspection work. The rest is how we'll work with you.
Proof
We'd rather show you a few things we can stand behind than a wall of logos. Inspections first, because that's where the overlap with your week is biggest.
AI drafts, logs and flags.Your people decide, every time.
How we work
The four week pilot is how we start: one job, a fixed scope agreed up front, and real calls, reports or files to judge it on instead of a demo. You only go further if it works for your team.
We look at one job your team does every week, how it moves through your software and your people, and whether AI can take the repeatable part. If it can't, we'll tell you.
One job on one property or team. We write your rules down first, build on your real examples, and run it live with a person checking every output.
We roll the tool out across your portfolio and keep the review steps your team chose in place.
We keep tuning it as your rules, properties and forms change, and we go through what it got wrong with your team so it gets fixed at the source.
Dental, healthcare, hospitality, manufacturing, and more.
Built on
The models, voice platforms and frameworks we build your tools with.
Questions
We build narrow AI tools for property management operations teams in the US and Canada. Each tool takes one repeatable job: answering the maintenance line, handling after hours leasing enquiries, drafting inspection reports, checking tenant files before an audit, or answering lease questions with the clause cited. A person on your team checks every output.
In a free 30 minute workflow review we'll look at how the job runs today, what the AI would take on and what a person would still check. If it isn't a fit, we'll say so.
Prefer to reach out directly?